CAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hertz Global Holdings has a net margin of -24.09% compared to Avis Budget Group's net margin of -24.44%. Avis Budget Group's return on equity of -- beat Hertz Global Holdings's return on equity of -291.93%.

Avis Budget Group has a consensus price target of $125.00, signalling downside risk potential of -34.69%. On the other hand Hertz Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $3.99 which suggests that it could fall by -47.04%. Given that Hertz Global Holdings has more downside risk than Avis Budget Group, analysts believe Avis Budget Group is more attractive than Hertz Global Holdings.

Avis Budget Group has a beta of 2.184, which suggesting that the stock is 118.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hertz Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Avis Budget Group has a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hertz Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Avis Budget Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hertz Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Avis Budget Group quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Hertz Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Avis Budget Group's net income of -$505M is lower than Hertz Global Holdings's net income of -$443M. Notably, Avis Budget Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.19x while Hertz Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avis Budget Group is 0.61x versus 0.26x for Hertz Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NAPCO Security Technologies has a net margin of -24.09% compared to Avis Budget Group's net margin of 23.03%. Avis Budget Group's return on equity of -- beat NAPCO Security Technologies's return on equity of 26.3%.

Avis Budget Group has a consensus price target of $125.00, signalling downside risk potential of -34.69%. On the other hand NAPCO Security Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $30.08 which suggests that it could fall by -2.52%. Given that Avis Budget Group has more downside risk than NAPCO Security Technologies, analysts believe NAPCO Security Technologies is more attractive than Avis Budget Group.

Avis Budget Group has a beta of 2.184, which suggesting that the stock is 118.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NAPCO Security Technologies has a beta of 1.436, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.552%.

Avis Budget Group has a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NAPCO Security Technologies offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Avis Budget Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NAPCO Security Technologies pays out 26.61% of its earnings as a dividend. NAPCO Security Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avis Budget Group quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than NAPCO Security Technologies quarterly revenues of $44M. Avis Budget Group's net income of -$505M is lower than NAPCO Security Technologies's net income of $10.1M. Notably, Avis Budget Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.19x while NAPCO Security Technologies's PE ratio is 25.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avis Budget Group is 0.61x versus 6.27x for NAPCO Security Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryder System has a net margin of -24.09% compared to Avis Budget Group's net margin of 3.12%. Avis Budget Group's return on equity of -- beat Ryder System's return on equity of 16.38%.

Avis Budget Group has a consensus price target of $125.00, signalling downside risk potential of -34.69%. On the other hand Ryder System has an analysts' consensus of $171.50 which suggests that it could fall by -2.77%. Given that Avis Budget Group has more downside risk than Ryder System, analysts believe Ryder System is more attractive than Avis Budget Group.

Avis Budget Group has a beta of 2.184, which suggesting that the stock is 118.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryder System has a beta of 0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.268%.

Avis Budget Group has a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryder System offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Avis Budget Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System pays out 27.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avis Budget Group quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Ryder System quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Avis Budget Group's net income of -$505M is lower than Ryder System's net income of $98M. Notably, Avis Budget Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.19x while Ryder System's PE ratio is 15.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avis Budget Group is 0.61x versus 0.61x for Ryder System. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

U-Haul Holding has a net margin of -24.09% compared to Avis Budget Group's net margin of -6.67%. Avis Budget Group's return on equity of -- beat U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 4.94%.

Avis Budget Group has a consensus price target of $125.00, signalling downside risk potential of -34.69%. On the other hand U-Haul Holding has an analysts' consensus of $89.84 which suggests that it could grow by 45.11%. Given that U-Haul Holding has higher upside potential than Avis Budget Group, analysts believe U-Haul Holding is more attractive than Avis Budget Group.

Avis Budget Group has a beta of 2.184, which suggesting that the stock is 118.424% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.252, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.188%.

Avis Budget Group has a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. U-Haul Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Avis Budget Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding pays out 9.62% of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avis Budget Group quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Avis Budget Group's net income of -$505M is lower than U-Haul Holding's net income of -$82.3M. Notably, Avis Budget Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.19x while U-Haul Holding's PE ratio is 36.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avis Budget Group is 0.61x versus 2.08x for U-Haul Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.